Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he was “excited” that “another peace agreement” was reached with another Arab country on Friday. But Dennis B. Ross, a former Middle East peace negotiator who helped mediate the 1993 agreement, said the two events were “very different.” He said the agreements signed on Tuesday were “important” because they show that “the Palestinians cannot freeze the region and prevent open cooperation with Israel.” Palestinian leaders were not informed of the plan and accused the United Arab Emirates of selling it. They reject the United Arab Emirates` assertion that the agreement would protect Palestinian interests by accusing it of The Israel Agreement of failing to advance the annexation of the West Bank. Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi said the agreement must be pursued by abandoning any plan to annex parts of the West Bank and that if the agreement could lead to its withdrawal from the Palestinian territories, it would bring the Middle East closer to peace. Otherwise, the Arab-Israeli conflict would only get worse.  Foreign Minister Gabi Ashkenazi said the agreement would pave the way for peace agreements with other nations and welcomed the suspension of unilateral annexation. Yesh Atid`s chairman Yair Lapid welcomed the agreement as a “important step” for normalization with the UAE and said it showed mutual agreements are the path to be path to be path for Israel`s relations with other nations, instead of unilateral steps like annexation. The president of the Israeli Workers` Party, Amir Peretz, also shared this view and said that Israel`s development and security were in such agreements. He hoped for a similar agreement with the Palestinians.  Each party recognizes the right of the vessels of the other contracting party to transit innocently in its territorial waters, in accordance with international law.
Each contracting party grants normal access to its ports to the ships and cargoes of the other party, as well as to ships and cargo destined for or from the other party. This access is granted on the same conditions that generally apply to ships and cargoes from other countries. The contracting parties may enter into maritime agreements and arrangements. As a condition of the UAE`s agreement to normalize relations, Mr. Netanyahu agreed to freeze his plan to annex parts of the West Bank. But the Palestinians seemed to be a reflection barely mentioned in the official remarks of the day. Bilateral agreements formalize the normalization of Israel`s already thawed relations with the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain, in accordance with their common opposition to Iran. But the agreements do not address decades of conflict between Israel and the Palestinians, who see the pacts as a blow to the back of their Arab colleagues and a betrayal of their cause for a Palestinian state. Nabil Abu Rudeineh, a senior adviser to President Mahmoud Abbas, read an official statement in which Palestinian leaders rejected the agreement and called it treason against Jerusalem, the Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Palestinians.  The Palestinian Authority (PNA) recalled its ambassador from Abu Dhabi.   Palestinian leaders also said that Hamas leader called Ismail Haniyeh Abbas and rejected the agreement, which Reuters called a “rare manifestation of unity.”  The threat of annexation was not the only reason for the agreements.
Israel, Saudi Arabia and the UAE – and the Trump administration – agree on their hostility towards Iran. The U.U.E. expected the agreement to take advantage of the agreement by finally allowing progressive F-35 fighter jets to purchase stealth fighter jets from the United States, although this possibility has raised the alarm in Israel. For Mr. Netanyahu, normalization has given a political boost at a time when he is under intense criticism for his handling of the coronavirus pandemic and a process of corruption, while in M.